New Car Assessment Programme Archives

There are still new cars that cannot score a single star in NCAP tests (w/video)

Before Euro NCAP (New Car Assessment Programme) came into existence, the safety performance of cars was not known to the public. While carmakers conducted their own tests, they did not necessarily share the results with the public. Of course, as responsible companies, they constantly aimed to make their products safer and to provide the best possible protection for occupants during an accident.

But just how safe was a car? That was not known until EuroNCAP was established in 1996 and began to crash new cars to see how they performed. EuroNCAP’s findings were made public in a standardized form so that comparisons could be made for car-buyers to make informed decisions. Cars that scored better would usually have better safety features, which added cost, and it was up to buyers if they wanted to pay more for the extra protection.

*Most new models tested by EuroNCAP can score the maximum of 5 stars.*

EuroNCAP focussed on new models sold in the European markets and for many years, their results were also used by carmakers when marketing the same models in other regions. In time, it was realized that due to overseas production of certain models, there could be differences in the safety performance due to engineering differences in some areas. This led to the establishment of NCAP organizations in other regions which focussed on models which were made and sold in those regions.

ASEAN NCAP is one of them and has been evaluating new models sold in the region for the past 10 years. In fact, ASEAN NCAP can be credited for pushing carmakers to raise safety standards with the addition of certain safety systems and features which are required in order to score the maximum number of stars.

The existence of these NCAP organizations has brought about discoveries of the differences in performance of some models in different regions. There have been cases of a model sold in Europe offering much poorer protection when built for sale in South American markets. Likewise, a number of cars in India have been found to scored poorly when subjected to crash tests.

With such information made public, manufacturers have had no choice but to make improvements to make their vehicles safer and more in line with global standards. Although NCAP results are not referred to when vehicles are inspected by local authorities in various countries, they are still important as car-buyers refer to them. A high score would give more confidence to a customer who in interested in a particular model, so manufacturers work hard to achieve the best score which is typically 5 stars.

Many new models can now score maximum stars and carmakers like Toyota have been recognized for offering the most models with 5-star ratings in ASEAN. It may seem that in this day and age, most new vehicles will be able to get a few stars, so it is shocking to know that there are some models that fail to get even a single star!

This has been the case with the latest Hyundai Tucson which was tested by Latin NCAP which evaluates models sold in the Central and South American markets. The model was unable to be given even a single star which was disturbing because a Tucson tested by EuroNCAP a month earlier had been able to get 5 stars. The initial reaction of many people was that the model built for Latin American markets was not engineered differently or lacked too many safety features. However, it was learnt that the model tested by Latin NCAP was actually an older fourth generation one, whereas EuroNCAP had tested the latest fifth generation model.

The Tucson tested actually scored well in adult protection for frontal and side impacts, as well as in whiplash protection as it at least has two front airbags. However, with no side airbags and inadequate chest protection as well as poor child occupant protection, its overall score could not even rate one star, not to mention that it also did not have any form of electronic stability control.

“Latin NCAP is disappointed by Hyundai’s attitude to Latin American consumers’ health and safety. It is unbelievable that an SUV like the Tucson does not offer side impact protection and ESC as standard. The long delay in replacement parts delivery is also concerning. We make an urgent call to Hyundai for a dramatic change in basic safety strategy in LAC and level it to its policy in Europe, Australia and USA, among others,” said Alejandro Furas, Secretary General of Latin NCAP.

“Once again, thanks to Latin NCAP, we can know the risks that certain corporations, mostly Latin Americans, expose us to due to the sale of low safety vehicles. Hyundai gives us an unpleasant surprise to see that one of its most popular models in the region, the Hyundai Tucson, which has had significant sales in our countries, gets 0 stars safety. This is one more example of the discrimination in vehicle safety that the inhabitants of the region have to suffer from some car manufacturers that use our region as a sub-standard market to maximize their profits,” added Stephan Brodziak, Chairman of Latin NCAP.

*Hyundai models sold in Malaysia, like the forthcoming Palisade SUV (above), are high-scorers in NCAP tests as Malaysian regulations require high safety standards.*

A zero-star result would certainly discourage most buyers and fortunately, this is not the case with Hyundai models sold in Malaysia. The Tucson is not currently sold (but has been in previous generations) but for the models imported to Malaysia, Hyundai Sime Darby Motors has been taking models with specifications comparable to those sold in Europe due to the tougher requirements of Malaysian regulations.

But while models sold in Europe may lead in safety performance when tested by EuroNCAP, this is not the case with every model. In its most recent series of tests, EuroNCAP found that the latest Renault ZOE EV was poorer than before – so poor in crash-tests overall, poor in vulnerable road user protection and lacking meaningful crash avoidance technology, that it was disqualified from getting any stars.

It would seem that while giving attention to improvements for the battery pack, Renault had compromised on safety elements. EuroNCAP noted that the seat-mounted side airbag which previously protected head and thorax has been replaced by a less effective thorax-only airbag, representing a degradation in occupant protection.

“Renault was once synonymous with safety. The Laguna was the first car to get 5 stars, back in 2001. But these disappointing results for the ZOE and the Dacia Spring show that safety has now become collateral damage in the group’s transition to electric cars. Not only do these cars fail to offer any appreciable active safety as standard, but their occupant protection is also worse than any vehicle we have seen in many years. It is cynical to offer the consumer an affordable green car if it comes at the price of higher injury risk in the event of an accident,” said Michiel van Ratingen, Secretary-General of Euro NCAP.

ASEAN NCAP testing to include Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) systems

Euro NCAP assessments become tougher in 2020 with new protocols

Since 1997, the European New Car Assessment Programme – better known as Euro NCAP – has conducted independent assessments of new vehicles sold in Europe for consumers’ information. The assessments include crash tests (but are not the only aspect) as well as other active systems influencing safety performance.

While several European governments, motoring, consumer and insurance organizations support the work of Euro NCAP, their star ratings – summaries of the results from assessments – are not specified in vehicle safety regulations. However, Euro NCAP has, over the years, been influential in pushing manufacturers to incorporate new and better safety systems as they have become available and affordable.

Consumers refer to the star ratings and other information in the reports to help them in deciding which model to buy. Naturally, a maximum 5-star rating is ideal but sometimes, this means a higher cost so the consumer can make an informed choice to settle for 4 stars instead. In some cases, very poor scores will affect sales as consumers understand that they will not be sufficiently protected in the event of an accident.

Every 2 years, Euro NCAP updates and toughens its testing processes, adding new requirements in order to score maximum points. This year, new tests are introduced to address some longstanding needs in occupant protection, improve post-crash protection and promote the latest advanced driver assistance technology.

A key change is the implementation of a new moving barrier to the moving car frontal crash test, replacing the regulation-based moderate offset-deformable barrier test, used by Euro NCAP for the last 23 years. This new crash test not only evaluates the protection of occupants inside the car, but also assesses how the cars’ front-end structures contribute to injuries in the collision partner.

Important innovations are the Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier and the unique method to rate vehicle compatibility, as well as the first adoption of the world’s most advanced ‘THOR’ mid-sized male crash test dummy.

THOR crash dummy — *Inside the advanced THOR dummy used for recording effects on the human body during a crash.*

Side impacts account for the second highest frequency of death or serious injuries. The latest updates to this area of the safety assessment include adjustments to the near-side barrier test speed and mass, increasing the severity of the test. More significantly, Euro NCAP will for the first time evaluate far-side impact protection, focussing on driver protection and the potential interaction between driver and front seat passenger. With the latter test, the protection offered by new-to-market countermeasures such as centre airbags can be adequately verified.

Euro NCAP continues to test the latest generation of crash prevention and driver assistance systems. New, challenging test scenarios are added to rate AEB technology for cars and vulnerable road-users. In addition, the first step is taken to evaluate Driver Status Monitoring systems, designed to detect driver fatigue and distraction, as part of the Safety Assist assessment.

Euro NCAP Child safety — *Child restraint systems and provisions for protecting children are also evaluated.*

AEB Euro NCAP — *Since 2013, Euro NCAP has also been assessing Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB), influencing more and more manufacturers to offer the system which automatically brakes the car.*

Improving your car’s safety isn’t just about more airbags or better driver assistance systems. Post-crash safety too plays a vital role in crash survival. In partnership with the International Association of Fire & Rescue Services, Euro NCAP has developed new rating rules to promote better post-crash safety. Manufacturers will be rewarded when rescue information is accurate and easily available. Euro NCAP also checks ease of extrication, electric door handles, etc. and endorses advanced eCall functions.

The organisation believes the impact of these updates, as well some other minor changes, will be significant. Therefore, consumers must be careful when directly comparing the latest results with ratings from previous years. What stays the same is that only vehicles that perform excellently in crash protection, post-crash and crash avoidance – and the ones that car buyers should look out for – will achieve the top 5-Star rating.

The success of Euro NCAP has inspired the establishment of similar organisations in other regions, including Southeast Asia where there is the ASEAN NCAP.

Mazda CX-30 is the safest model tested by Euro NCAP to date

Covid-19 — **Fighting COVID-19 is our joint responsibility. Protect yourself and others: make these 6 simple precautions your new habits.**

Mazda CX-30 is the safest model tested by Euro NCAP to date

The New Car Assessment Programmes (NCAPs) of various countries and regions are conducted by independent organisations and though the scores awarded are not required by authorities in any country for a vehicle to be homologated for sale (provided the vehicle meets regulations). However, consumers pay attention to NCAP scores so as to be better informed when they are considering a vehicle to buy.

Since the mid-1990s, Euro NCAP has been conducting such a programme which includes crash tests. Over the years, the organization has progressively raised its standards and the criteria has evolved, challenging carmakers to make their cars safer and safer. Achieving the maximum of 5 stars and high scores in the various categories of testing can help a model’s sales in the market where buyers are increasingly concerned about safety.

CX-30 has near-perfect score
In its latest series of tests on new models sold in Europe, Euro NCAP’s results show that the new Mazda CX-30, a subcompact crossover between the CX-3 and CX-5, achieved a near-perfect 99% score for Adult Occupant Protection (AOP), besides the maximum of 5 stars.

The model, which shares much of its DNA with the all-new Mazda 3, now tops the list for this part of the assessment against Euro NCAP’s 2018/2019 protocols. The highest ratings on record have been at the 98% level with the Alfa Romeo Giulia, Mazda3, Volvo XC60 and Volvo V40.

The CX-30’s impressive AOP score was gained by getting maximum points in the different impact tests (side, pole and barrier). Many vehicles don’t perform so well in the pole test where the vehicle is sent sideways smashing into a pole.

The report said the passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test, with good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. A similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

The standard autonomous emergency braking system or ‘Smart Brake Support’ (SBS) performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which whiplash injuries often occur. With collisions avoided in all test scenarios, the CX-30 scored full points in this part of the assessment.

Reducing pedestrian injuries
The protection offered to the head of a struck pedestrian was good over almost all of the bonnet surface and adequate over much of the rest. Good protection was provided to pedestrians’ legs by the bumper and protection of the pelvis was also rated as good at all test locations.

The SBS can detect vulnerable road-users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests of its reaction to such road-users, the system performed adequately, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most scenarios.

CX-30 for Malaysia?
Bermaz Motor has confirmed that the CX-30 will be available for the Malaysian market but when it will be in showrooms is not known yet. Given the high demand for the new CX-5 (in Malaysia as well as other markets) which is assembled at the Mazda Malaysia plant in Kedah, it seems unlikely that the CX-30 will be assembled locally. This could mean it will be somewhat expensive with the high taxes imposed.

Visit www.mazda.com.my to know more about Mazda products and services available in Malaysia.

(more…)

Piston.my